This poll is closed.
2007-03-27 23:42:04, posting from 188.8.131.52
. . . because Booth did it.
2007-03-28 07:21:25, posting from 184.108.40.206
Tough vote -- 'cause it's a toss up.
I voted 'Booth' for the same reason as Paul.
2007-03-28 07:35:50, posting from 220.127.116.11
Makes me glad I don't go by three names.
2007-03-28 07:53:12, posting from 18.104.22.168
Oh, you will if you ever assassinate someone. Patrick John Hannon. The sound of it sends chills down my spine.
2007-03-28 09:26:45, posting from 22.214.171.124
I found myself ruminating on who did more damage to the US... weird.
2007-03-28 11:50:43, posting from 126.96.36.199
Butterfly effect. Who's bullet altered history more. I voted for Booth.
It essentially set civil rights in America back 100 years. You could argue that perhaps if Kennedy had lived key events in the last half of the 20th century would never have happend. But I think it's too early to have that kind of historical hindsight just yet.
Has anyone read Manhunt: The 12-Day Chase for Lincoln's Killer? Good? Bad?
2007-03-29 04:29:18, posting from 188.8.131.52
I voted for the guy that did less damage (Oswald)... whether he did it or not, Lincoln was the greater loss.
2007-03-29 06:15:55, posting from 184.108.40.206
Hey Randy, I haven't read 'Manhunt,' but I have a friend who did (book on tape) and she raves about it. I'll probably give it a try someday.
RSS Feed(What's this?)
Save to del.icio.us
ToT is sponsored by Randy's "dynamite" Etsy store: